Last edited by Yokinos
Thursday, July 30, 2020 | History

1 edition of Evaluating mental health capitation treatment found in the catalog.

Evaluating mental health capitation treatment

Evaluating mental health capitation treatment

lessons from panel data

  • 247 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading

Published by National Bureau of Economic Research in Cambridge, MA .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Mental illness -- Treatment -- Cost effectiveness -- Econometric models.,
  • Mental illness -- Treatment -- New York (State) -- Rochester.

  • Edition Notes

    StatementDebra Sabatini Dwyer ... [et al.].
    SeriesNBER working paper series -- working paper no. 5297, Working paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research) -- working paper no. 5297.
    ContributionsDwyer, Debra Sabatini., National Bureau of Economic Research.
    The Physical Object
    Pagination27, [7] p.
    Number of Pages27
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL22417732M

    The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics J Ment Health Policy Econ8, () Variation in Outpatient Mental Health Service Utilization under Capitation Ann F. Chou,1* Neal Wallace,2 Joan R. Bloom,3 Teh-Wei Hu3 1 Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Professor, Health Services & Research Development, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center. encounters for outpatient and evaluation and treatment (E&T) services. Additionally, for MH, inpatient services are captured on a fee-for-service (FFS) basis through the ProviderOne (P1) system for Medicaid eligible individuals in the Medicaid mental health program.

    Mental Health Costs and Outcomes Under Alternative Capitation Systems in Colorado The use of capitation for financing mental health care is a growing trend in the United States. Capitation is defined as a method of payment where a fixed price is paid for each enrolled client, for a specified time period, for a specific. Book Review – The medical model in mental health: an explanation and evaluation by Ahmed Samei Huda, Oxford, Oxford University Press, , pp.,£ (paperback), ISBN In the National Institute for health and Care Excellence (NICE) published its guidelines on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

    Capitation is a payment system where lump-sum payments are made to care providers based on the number of patients in a target population, to provide some or all of their care needs. The capitation payment is not linked to how much care is provided. Capitation is used to determine core funding for UK general practice. What is monitoring and evaluation? 9 Aspects of a mental health policy and plan requiring evaluation 10 Monitoring and evaluating a mental health policy and plan 12 Research methods for evaluating a mental health policy and plan 14 Experimental designs 15 Non-experimental designs 15 Economic evaluation


Share this book
You might also like
Ultimate spy.

Ultimate spy.

The Ways of the Hour.

The Ways of the Hour.

Directory iron and steel plants.

Directory iron and steel plants.

Personal risk

Personal risk

Neuroendoscopy

Neuroendoscopy

statewide comprehensive plan for fish and wildlife on the national forests in the State of Oregon

statewide comprehensive plan for fish and wildlife on the national forests in the State of Oregon

Penrith Presbyterian church

Penrith Presbyterian church

Siren land

Siren land

Herbicide tests for control of Brazilian-pepper and melaleuca in Florida

Herbicide tests for control of Brazilian-pepper and melaleuca in Florida

Review of policy for people with a learning disability

Review of policy for people with a learning disability

Detente: perspectives and repercussions

Detente: perspectives and repercussions

Co-ordinated monetary and foreign exchange intervention

Co-ordinated monetary and foreign exchange intervention

Mineral specimens

Mineral specimens

1. Catonis Disticha de moribus

1. Catonis Disticha de moribus

Evaluating mental health capitation treatment Download PDF EPUB FB2

The Evaluating mental health capitation treatment book defines capitation within the context of various health care reimbursement approaches, presents arguments for and against capitation, reviews the record of capitation for general medical care, and discusses proposals for capitation systems for high-risk patient by: Additional Physical Format: Online version: Evaluating mental health capitation treatment.

Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, © Evaluating Mental Health Capitation Treatment: Lessons from Panel Data Debra Sabatini Dwyer, Olivia S. Mitchell, Robert Cole, Sylvia K. Reed.

NBER Working Paper No. Issued in October NBER Program(s):Health Care The paper evaluates a capitation-financed system of mental health services delivery developed in Rochester, New by: Downloadable. The paper evaluates a capitation-financed system of mental health services delivery developed in Rochester, New York.

Cost/benefit analysis of the treatment program is implemented on three years of data using program evaluation techniques. Patient outcomes are compared across randomly assigned study groups as well as across enrollment status.

Get this from a library. Evaluating mental health capitation treatment: lessons from panel data. [Debra Sabatini Dwyer; National Bureau of Economic Research.;] -- Abstract: The paper evaluates a capitation-financed system of mental health services delivery developed in Rochester, New York.

Cost/benefit analysis of the treatment program is implemented on three. The capitation rate covers all Medicaid-eligible individuals for psychiatric inpatient care at local hospitals, specialty mental health outpatient services, mental health services for persons in nursing homes, and state hospital services for persons 21 years of age and younger and persons 65 years of age and older.

Evaluating innovative mental health care in Germany. Thomas Becker, Annabel Stierlin, Reinhold Kilian, Ulm/Günzburg, Germany. There is an interest in innovative mental health service models in Germany.

This comprises, among others, crisis intervention and home treatment service models and assertive community treatment teams. The authors describe an evaluation of the influences on service access, adequacy, and appropriateness in four capitated public mental health programs.

Access, adequacy, and appropriateness were higher than the fee for service programs, suggesting that the financial incentive in capitation was not a significant limiting factor. Access and adequacy were also limited by new program effects as.

This document presents a set of criteria to be used in evaluating treatment guidelines that have been promulgated by health care organizations, government agencies, professional associations, or other entities. 1 Although originally developed for mental health interventions, the criteria presented are equally applicable in other health service areas.

based on services with local prices (such as mental health) could be used in the context of services with national prices (where a different local payment approach based on variation of national prices would be necessary). Where there is a mix of health and social care the national tariff rules continue to apply to the healthcare services.

As practitioners, we are well aware of the monumental changes occurring in our workplace, be it the office, the clinic, or the hospital. We have witnessed the expectations for health care reform rise and fall as efforts to develop and enact the Clinton Health Plan gripped the country from early to the late summer of 1 We have shared the national concern about the cost of health care.

One would expect mental health treatment to help reduce the juvenile justice response, unless, perhaps, the treatment is provided under risk-based managed care. One type of risk-based managed care is capitation, which pays a fixed fee to the provider for all treatment of each eligible person for a specified time period.

policy, resources, and services for mental health care, as well as develop external provider networks and serve as providers of last resort. While LMHAs contract with local providers for some services, they retain a significant role as direct providers of service.

Contracts between the HHSC and mental health and SUD providers have traditionally. Capitation payments are used by managed care organizations to control health care costs. Capitation payments control use of health care resources by putting the physician at financial risk for services provided to patients.

At the same time, in order to ensure that patients do not receive suboptimal care through under-utilization of health care. PsychiatryOnline subscription options offer access to the DSM-5 library, books, journals, CME, and patient resources.

This all-in-one virtual library provides psychiatrists and mental health professionals with key resources for diagnosis, treatment, research, and professional development. Research Article Health Affairs Vol No.3 Partial Capitation Versus Fee-For-Service in Mental Health Care.

In Colorado's Medicaid program instituted capitation for mental health services in two areas of the state, one in which reimbursement of not-for-profit providers was directly capitated and. “The Mental Health HMO: Capitation Funding for the Chronically Mentally Ill,” Community Mental Health Journal 28 (): - ; Crossref, Medline Cole R.E., et al.

Under the capitated model, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), a state, and a health plan enter into a three-way contract to provide comprehensive, coordinated care. In the capitated model, CMS and the state will pay each health plan a prospective capitation payment.

More information on. Capitation poses specific problems when applied to mental health services delivery.

This article discusses several of the major issues pertaining to the utility of capitation in mental health, discusses on‐going capitation efforts, and provides an evaluation of capitation programs. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH DATA BOOK STATE FISCAL YEAR OCTO •Mental Health • CY – Inpatient claim data • CY – E&T encounter data Evaluation and Treatment Family Treatment High-Intensity Treatment Individual Treatment Services Residential MH Service Special Population.Health, work, and economic well-being of older workers: A cross-national comparison using the United States HRS and Dutch CERRA.

In J. Smith & R. Willis (Eds.), Wealth, work, and health: Innovations in measurement in the social science (pp. ).Los Angeles PARTNERS is a treatment program that uses capitation to shift risk for treatment costs of high utilizers of public mental health services to private community based treatment organizations.

This analysis reveals two important findings from PARTNERS.